Usefulness of anti-dsDNA antibody screening with chemiluminescence followed by confirmation by indirect immunofluorescence.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of a chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) to detect anti-dsDNA antibodies, using the indirect immunofluorescence test (IIF) on Crithidia luciliae as a reference. METHODS: The automation system demonstrated 81% efficiency, 100% sensitivity and 82% specificity according to the intrinsic validation process performed using 179 consecutive samples from 169 patients in the beginning of 2011. These patients were subsequently divided into 3 groups according to the co-reactivity of anti-dsDNA results using the 2 methods (reactive, non-reactive and discrepant results). RESULTS: Upon data analysis, 77% (129/169) of the tests were requested by rheumatologists, and 57% (97/169) of the samples were from lupus patients. Both the reactive and non-reactive results of the CLIA were well defined and standardised, and automation reduced the manual labor required by 70% in a safe and high-quality manner. Furthermore, the high prevalence of patients with lupus and nephritis among the CLIA false-positive results corroborates the hypothesis that the actual index of CLIA false positivity is lower than that initially found in this study.

Utilidade da triagem dos anticorpos anti-dsDNA por quimioluminescência, seguida de confirmação por imunofluorescência indireta / Usefulness of anti-dsDNA antibody screening with chemiluminescence followed by confirmation by indirect immunofluorescence

OBJETIVO: Avaliar o desempenho de um imunoensaio quimioluminescente (CLIA) para os anticorpos anti-dsDNA, utilizando como referência o teste de imunofluorescência indireta (IFI) sobre Crithidia luciliae. MÉTODOS: O sistema de automação foi previamente aprovado com 81% de eficiência, 100% de sensibilidade e 82% de especificidade, por processo de validação intrínseca em 179 amostras consecutivas de 169 pacientes no início de 2011. A seguir, esses pacientes foram subdivididos em três grupos de acordo com os resultados da pesquisa dos anticorpos anti-dsDNA nas duas metodologias (reagentes, não reagentes e resultados discrepantes). RESULTADOS: Na análise dos dados: 1) 77% (129/169) dos exames haviam sido solicitados por médicos reumatologistas; 2) 57% (97/169) das amostras eram de pacientes lúpicos; 3) Os resultados de CLIA, reagentes e não reagentes, estavam bem definidos e padronizados; 4) A automação reduziu em 70% as passagens pela técnica manual com segurança e qualidade; 5) A alta prevalência de pacientes lúpicos e com nefrite entre os resultados de CLIA falso-positivos corrobora a hipótese de que o índice real de falsa positividade do CLIA seja menor que o encontrado inicialmente neste estudo.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of a chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) to detect anti-dsDNA antibodies, using the indirect immunofluorescence test (IIF) on Crithidia luciliae as a reference. METHODS: The automation system demonstrated 81% efficiency, 100% sensitivity and 82% specificity according to the intrinsic validation process performed using 179 consecutive samples from 169 patients in the beginning of 2011. These patients were subsequently divided into 3 groups according to the co-reactivity of anti-dsDNA results using the 2 methods (reactive, non-reactive and discrepant results). RESULTS: Upon data analysis, 77% (129/169) of the tests were requested by rheumatologists, and 57% (97/169) of the samples were from lupus patients. Both the reactive and non-reactive results of the CLIA were well defined and standardised, and automation reduced the manual labor required by 70% in a safe and high-quality manner. Furthermore, the high prevalence of patients with lupus and nephritis among the CLIA false-positive results corroborates the hypothesis that the actual index of CLIA false positivity is lower than that initially found in this study.